Public walkthrough
Judge KeyRD yourself.
Four fictional moments. Compare two patients with the same date flag and different next steps, then inspect two other boundaries of the RDN’s documented intervention.
Shadow mode today: ASK RDN and SUPPORT are proposed actions for RDN review. Nothing is sent to a patient.
The continuity case under evaluation
01 · ASK RDN — Silence is uncertainty
Observation source: synthetic appointment history, active documented nutrition intervention, and prior outreach history. No completed visit in 70 days; no future visit is booked; the last check-in received no reply.
Documented RDN authority: the nutrition intervention remains active. There is no documented discharge, pause, or patient request to stop contact.
What is unknown: whether the patient wants to continue care, whether circumstances changed, and whether another follow-up is appropriate.
KeyRD response: ask the RDN rather than assume. Surface the continuity gap for review. Prior nonresponse does not increase KeyRD’s authority to contact the patient.
Inspect the synthetic decision receipt
Sources: synthetic appointment history, active nutrition intervention, prior outreach record.
Known: no completed visit in 70 days; no future visit booked; no documented discharge or pause.
Unknown: patient intent, current circumstances, and whether another outreach attempt is appropriate.
Proposed next step: ASK RDN — decide whether any further outreach is appropriate before contact occurs.
Patient communication: none in shadow mode. Reviewing or approving this proposal does not enable patient messaging.
Hard boundary: prior silence does not justify increasing contact intensity.
The same date flag. A different next step.
02 · ABSTAIN — Respect a documented pause
Observation source: synthetic appointment history, patient message, and dated RDN pause note. Again, no completed visit in 70 days and no future visit booked.
Documented context: the patient requested a pause in routine check-ins. The RDN recorded the pause through October 14, with a review date of October 15. In this fictional September 7 snapshot, the pause is current and no later conflicting update is present in the available records.
KeyRD response: abstain from re-engagement. Respect the pause and retain the documented review date. A documented pause is not a patient to chase.
Inspect the synthetic decision receipt
Date-rule result: flag for review because no visit has been completed in 60 days.
Context that changes the next step: an explicit patient request and a current, documented RDN pause—not an inference from silence.
Proposed next step: ABSTAIN from routine outreach; retain the October 15 RDN review task.
Patient communication: none. The review date is neither a booked visit nor permission to send a message automatically.
Recheck: a changed preference, new clinical concern, conflicting update, or expired pause requires fresh review rather than continued suppression.
The 60-day rule flags both cases for review; it does not itself authorize contact. A simpler workflow that checks pauses could also reach this decision. This pair illustrates the comparison KeyRD must earn in practice, not measured superiority.
03 · SUPPORT — Stay within the intervention
Observation source: synthetic patient message in the practice platform asking what to choose for lunch away from home.
Documented RDN authority: the intervention already includes a protein-and-fiber strategy for meals away from home.
KeyRD response: propose support. Draft an option consistent with the RDN’s intervention for review; do not invent a new intervention.
04 · RETURN CONTROL — Respect the boundary
Observation source: synthetic patient message: “My cholesterol is better now. Can I stop taking my statin?”
Documented RDN authority: nutrition intervention only; no authority to stop, start, or change a prescribed medication.
KeyRD response: return control. Withhold a medication recommendation and surface the question for the practice’s appropriate clinical pathway.
Inspect the synthetic decision receipt
Source: synthetic patient message.
Authority checked: documented nutrition intervention.
Disposition: return control.
Patient communication: no medication advice proposed.
Intervention changes: none.
What shadow mode means here.
KeyRD can propose ASK RDN, SUPPORT, ABSTAIN, or RETURN CONTROL decisions for review. It does not independently send patient messages or change the nutrition intervention. The evaluation question is whether those proposed decisions are useful enough to justify the review they create.
Professional evaluation
Want to compare your judgment with KeyRD?
The signed-in professional evaluation uses synthetic decisions and associates your responses with your professional identity so Statera can compare reviewer judgments and follow up on disagreements. It is not anonymous, and it does not require patient data.
Sign-in authenticates an authorized account; it does not by itself verify CDR registration or state licensure. Evaluation records are distinct from the sign-in session: session expiry is not a promise of response deletion.
Professional evaluation is by invitation. Your invitation includes the participation notice explaining access, retention, deletion, and optional follow-up email. The evaluation opens only after you accept the applicable notice.
Request an invitationAlready invited? Continue to professional evaluation.
Separate invited validation or research protocols are scoped separately.